Skip to content
ISSN NO. : 0970-4175 (Print)

 

Search

The Book Review, Monthly Review of Important BooksThe Book Review, Monthly Review of Important Books
The Book Review, Monthly Review of Important Books
  • HOME
  • THE BOOK REVIEW
    • ABOUT
    • FOUNDER TRUSTEES
    • THE JOURNAL
  • SUBSCRIPTIONS
    • PRINT & DIGITAL EDITION
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • ARCHIVES
    • Table of Contents
    • Reviews
  • MEDIA & EVENTS
    • EVENTS
  • CONTACT
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • HOME
  • THE BOOK REVIEW
    • ABOUT
    • FOUNDER TRUSTEES
    • THE JOURNAL
  • SUBSCRIPTIONS
    • PRINT & DIGITAL EDITION
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • ARCHIVES
    • Table of Contents
    • Reviews
  • MEDIA & EVENTS
    • EVENTS
  • CONTACT
  • ADVERTISEMENT

Sam Moyo: The Voice of Change

Review Details

Book Name: RETHINKING THE SOCIAL SCIENCES WITH SAM MOYO
Author name: Praveen Jha, Paris Yeros and Walter Chambati
Book Year: 2020
Book Price: 995.00
Reviewer name: Shivani Rajput
Volume No: 44
Publisher Name: Tulika Books, New Delhi
Book Pages: 356

Rethinking the Social Sciences with Sam Moyo is a tribute to one of Africa’s and Zimbabwe’s greatest modern thinker, Sam Moyo, who made an astounding contribution to social science with his intellectual work on the land and agrarian questions of the global South. The title of ‘fundi’[1] is truly apt for Sam Moyo. The essays in the book contextualize Moyo’s concerns with the global South in light of changes brought about by economic transitions and structural readjustment policies in peripheral regions. What stands out from a reading of the book is Moyo’s genuine commitment towards autonomous knowledge production from the South, and along with it, to bring about a change in society, a change that he believed in and advocated.

The book presents three essential points. First, it revisits the classical agrarian question (the European perspective), which has looked at the primal role of agriculture in industrialization to eradicate economic backwardness. Moyo elaborated that the contemporary agrarian question, carries with it the classical question, but also has its universal dimension, that of gender equity (Ossome 2020) and ecological sustainability. Since the agrarian transformation is taking place in the context of global financial capitalism―which sustains polarization between centre-periphery for its accumulation of wealth―the contemporary agrarian question is also a question of national liberation and sovereign industrialization (Moyo, Jha and Yeros 2015). Taking us through the arguments of Moyo, the volume successfully breaks away from the dichotomy of  the backward/industrial framework and unveils the myth of industrialization.

Second, it is a critique of western, eurocentric Marxists scholars. According to the Northern scholars, the classical agrarian question is dead (Bersnetin 2006) since agriculture has ceased to perform its fundamental role of industrialization. To them, the contemporary question is not one of peasants but that of labour, because they believe peasantry has ‘disappeared’ with industrialization. Moyo re-oriented scholarly attention to the emerging rural struggles of the South (particularly Zimbabwe’s experience of land reform in 2000 as an empirical site), to re-examine the land and agrarian question and also look into the diverse historical experience associated with industrialization. His meritorious attempt in building the South-South collaboration, his association with CODRESIA, AISA, ASN, International Agrarian Summer School and his commitment to  renew the intellectual tradition of pan-Africanism of political economy, particularly towards ‘decolonization of the knowledge in and about Africa’ (Martin 2020: 44) is admirable. According to the volume editors, Moyo’s intellectual journey laid down the principle of epistemic sovereignty (p. 18).

Please Login or Register to Read Entire Article !

Username:
Password:
Register
Lost your password?

[1] .Dzodzi Tsikata fondly uses this term for Moyo to describe his intellectual contribution to Africa’s agrarian and land issue. She writes, the term is ‘derived from “umfindisi”  (a teacher), from the Nguni family of languages, meaning a master craftsmen, expert or genius.’

[2] . The current health crisis points to the COVID-19 pandemic.

[3] . Spanish phrase for the struggle continues.

 

 

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:Differing Manifestations of RegulationsNextNext post:Nuances Of Tamil Politics and Culture

Related posts

A Template for Regional Studies
December 11, 2020
Putting Women Back into the Historical Canvas
December 11, 2020
Timeless Classics Retold
December 11, 2020
Promoting the ‘Scientific Method’ in History
December 11, 2020
A Record in Perspective
December 11, 2020
Untangling an Intriguing Riddle
December 11, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

clear formPost comment

Current Issue
  • Gandhi’s Tryst with Modernity April 5, 2021
  • How a Farman Gave an Inch and Lost a Mile April 5, 2021
Search in website

ABOUT US | DISCLAIMER | ADVERTISEMENT

All Right Reserved with The Book Review Literacy Trust | Powered by Digital Empowerment Foundation

FacebookTwitter