Skip to content
ISSN NO. : 0970-4175 (Print)

 

Search

The Book ReviewThe Book Review
The Book Review
  • HOME
  • THE BOOK REVIEW
    • ABOUT
    • FOUNDER TRUSTEES
    • THE JOURNAL
  • SUBSCRIPTIONS
    • PRINT & DIGITAL EDITION
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • ARCHIVES
    • Table of Contents
    • Reviews
  • MEDIA & EVENTS
    • EVENTS
  • CONTACT
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • HOME
  • THE BOOK REVIEW
    • ABOUT
    • FOUNDER TRUSTEES
    • THE JOURNAL
  • SUBSCRIPTIONS
    • PRINT & DIGITAL EDITION
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • ARCHIVES
    • Table of Contents
    • Reviews
  • MEDIA & EVENTS
    • EVENTS
  • CONTACT
  • ADVERTISEMENT

A Metaphor for History

Review Details

Book Name: GHASHIRAM KOTWAL
Author name: Vijay Tendulkar. Translated from the original Marathi by Dr Damodar Khadse
Book Year: 2019
Book Price: 199.00
Reviewer name: Sudhanva Deshpande
Volume No: 44
Publisher Name: Vaani Prakashan, New Delhi
Book Pages: 84

The accepted wisdom about Vijay Tendulkar’s plays is that they are about power and violence. Well, are they? Think of his ‘violent’ protagonists—Sakharam (in Sakharam Binder), Ramakant (Gidhade), Ghashiram (Ghashiram Kotwal), Benare’s prosecutors (Shantata! Court Chalu Ahe), Arun Athavale (Kanyadan), and others. Who, among them, is actually powerful? Sakharam bullies helpless women, but at the first sight of a woman with gumption, he becomes a whimpering puppy. Ramakant is abusive towards his wife, uncle and father, but cannot stand up to his two equals, his brother and half-brother. Ghashiram can be a tyrant only at Nana’s pleasure, once his ‘use’ is over, he is pitilessly cast aside. Benare’s prosecutors are petty, mean, vindictive, small men and women. Arun Athavale is a wife-beater from the historically powerless Dalit community.

Not one of them can be thought of as ‘powerful’. In fact, in crucial ways, they are all powerless. Tendulkar’s plays are about violence, it is true. But this violence is not the violence of the strong. It is the violence of the weak. This is the one line that runs through his cruel, pitiless, brutal oeuvre.

Too cruel, one has to think, too pitiless, too brutal. Which is why one is grateful for Ghashiram Kotwal. But for this play, Tendulkar’s oeuvre would be unbearable. So harsh is his language that the last thing one expects from Tendulkar is a musical. With Ghashiram, one can almost hear Tendulkar saying to the ‘theatre of roots’ wallahs, ‘Anything you can do, I can do better,’ to borrow from Annie Get Your Gun. (Though it should be mentioned that Tendulkar himself said that he did not ‘think of a form first and then look for a subject that will suit the form’. He arrived at the form, he says, through ‘a series of accidents’.)

Please Login or Register to Read Entire Article !

Username:
Password:
Register
Lost your password?

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:An Affair to RememberNextNext post:The Trauma of the Landless

Related posts

‘The Virtual is Eternal’
November 9, 2020
From Allahabad to IAS–Or Bust
November 9, 2020
Hinduism Explained in ‘A Conversational Mode’
November 9, 2020
Journey to Far Away Places
November 9, 2020
Gyan: Questions that May Never be Answered
November 9, 2020
A Saga of Loss and Survival
November 9, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

clear formPost comment

Current Issue
  • Issue 2002 November January 12, 2021
  • Issue 2002 September January 12, 2021
Search in website

ABOUT US | DISCLAIMER | ADVERTISEMENT

All Right Reserved with The Book Review Literacy Trust | Powered by Digital Empowerment Foundation

FacebookTwitter