The writing of social history in India has come full circle since Dr. Tapan Raychaudhuri’s pioneering Bengal Under Akbar and Jahangir (1953). In his Preface Dr. Raychaudhuri had defined the scope of social history, after G.M. Trevelyan, as ‘history with the politics left out’. In the 1969 edition of his book the author set aside Trevelyan’s ‘incorrect defini¬tion’ and replaced it with an ‘investigation of historical communities by the methods of social anthropology and sociology’. ‘The political’, quite categorically set aside in the first impression, was still on sufferance of the sister disciplines of history in the second. The essays by Profes¬sor Ravinder Kumar, written between 1969 and 1980 and collected in the book under review, offer a rather different mapping of the nebulous terrain of social history; for here we have a conscious effort to explore the relationship between ‘social structure and political processes.’
May-June 1984, volume 8, No 6
931425 456089Hello! Excellent stuff, please maintain us posted when you post once again something like that! 239602
213687 942719Woh I enjoy your articles , saved to favorites ! . 409764
223304 391557An fascinating discussion could be worth comment. I think you need to write on this subject, it may surely be a taboo topic but usually individuals are not enough to dicuss on such topics. To a higher. Cheers 378897